Comments on: Does your petabyte? http://archaeofacts.com/2008/08/28/does-your-petabyte/ Combo-land: musings with a snapshot each day… Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:53:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Sammy http://archaeofacts.com/2008/08/28/does-your-petabyte/comment-page-1/#comment-3684 Sammy Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:30:27 +0000 http://archaeofacts.com/?p=2295#comment-3684 I think maybe that the kind of data Anderson's talking about, the kind that's voluminous enough to constitute petabytes, may work the way he says, but that the less voluminous, small samples that I use would not. Still, it's interesting to contemplate the hypothesis that we've reached a time when some types of data have exceeded the must-be-modeled threshold. I think maybe that the kind of data Anderson’s talking about, the kind that’s voluminous enough to constitute petabytes, may work the way he says, but that the less voluminous, small samples that I use would not. Still, it’s interesting to contemplate the hypothesis that we’ve reached a time when some types of data have exceeded the must-be-modeled threshold.

]]> By: preclovis http://archaeofacts.com/2008/08/28/does-your-petabyte/comment-page-1/#comment-3682 preclovis Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:19:33 +0000 http://archaeofacts.com/?p=2295#comment-3682 I mean THAT is interesting. I am going to think about it all. It's a lot. T I mean THAT is interesting.

I am going to think about it all. It’s a lot.

T

]]> By: preclovis http://archaeofacts.com/2008/08/28/does-your-petabyte/comment-page-1/#comment-3681 preclovis Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:18:44 +0000 http://archaeofacts.com/?p=2295#comment-3681 Not that____is interesting - may I continue to believe that correlation is not causation until I understand? Not that____is interesting - may I continue to believe that correlation is not causation until I understand?

]]>